link rel="stylesheet" href="https://unpkg.com/@phosphor-icons/web@2.1.1/src/regular/style.css"

Why Operators Don’t Trust Your OT Asset Inventory and How to Fix It in 30 Days

Anthony Mondelli
Alaska OT/ICS Cybersecurity Lead
min. read
min. read
“If operators don’t trust the list, the list is useless.”

That single sentence captures the biggest problem with most OT asset inventories. You can spend weeks running scans, populating spreadsheets, and ticking compliance boxes, but if the people who actually run the plant don’t trust, or worse, won’t open the file, your “visibility” is just expensive shelfware. A defensible inventory isn’t a security artifact. It is an operational product that matches reality and actually helps the team keep the process running safely.

The 4 Reasons OT Inventories Break

Most inventories fail for the same four reasons, and every OT leader has lived at least some of them.

  1. They’re built from scans only. Active scanning misses air-gapped devices, legacy PLCs that don’t respond, and the all-important context of who owns what.
  2. They drown you in data but starve you of meaning. You get IP addresses and MACs, but no criticality rating, no process dependency map, no upstream/downstream links.
  3. They go stale the day after you publish them. Change is constant in OT—new spares, firmware updates, temporary bypasses—and the inventory never keeps up.
  4. They create friction. Operators have to log into yet another tool or fill out another form just to do their jobs, so they ignore it or log the bare minimum. 

What “Trustworthy” Really Means in OT

A trustworthy OT inventory doesn’t have to be perfect. It has to be accurate enough for decisions. It must be owned by the business, not just the security team. And it must be mapped to operations: what the asset actually does, what it impacts if it fails, and how it communicates.

Success looks like this: an operator can open the inventory, see their system, trust what’s listed, and use it to plan maintenance, respond to an upset, or approve a change, without having to call security first.

The Minimum Fields That Earn Trust

Keep it simple and establish a trustworthy baseline by stripping away the noise and focusing on just six fields that actually matter:

  • Asset identity – device type, vendor, model, firmware version, physical location.
  • Ownership – system owner, maintainer, and vendor support contact.
  • Criticality – safety impact, downtime cost, and process dependency.
  • Connectivity – Purdue zone, conduits, protocols, and upstream/downstream links.

Related Read: The 6 IT-OT Bridges That Could Compromise Your Operations

  • Access paths – remote access methods, privileged accounts, jump hosts, and vendor connections.
  • Lifecycle – patch constraints, spare parts status, and end-of-life date.

That’s it. Everything else is nice-to-have enrichment you can add later.

How to Build Momentum Without Disrupting Operations

Build trust first. Start with interviews and walkthroughs alongside operators and engineers. They know the real story the scans will never see. Use passive discovery tools to confirm what’s actually talking on the wire. Spot-check switch, router, and firewall configs for validation. When you find differences, don’t argue, simply document the “known unknowns” and move forward. This approach respects operations time and builds credibility from day one.

Where the OT Rubber Meets the Inventory Road: Making It Maintainable

The real test isn’t how you build the inventory, it’s whether six months from now it’s being used as planned. Here’s a few ways to ensure that it happens for you.

  • Assign clear ownership per system and per site.
  • Tie every inventory update to your existing change management process (inventory updates become part of “done”).
  • Set a review cadence: monthly for critical systems, quarterly for the rest.
  • Keep it simple. Launch with a minimum viable inventory, then enrich it over time.

When updates feel like part of normal operations instead of extra security homework, people actually do them. Once operators trust the list, you’ll see positive change, including:

  • Segmentation planning becomes realistic because you know the real conduits.
  • Remote access tightening is targeted, not blanket.
  • Vulnerability prioritization focuses on what actually matters to safety and uptime.
  • Incident response shifts from “what just got hit?” to “here’s the blast radius and the safest way to contain it.”

That’s exactly why we keep hammering the basics in pieces like The Five Most Common Attack Paths in Operational Technology and How to Prevent Them.

Do This Now: 30-Day Checklist

Start by picking one critical process area and go deep.

  1. Create a zones-and-conduits view for that area.
  2. Document every remote access path to those assets.
  3. Publish a simple one-page “how to request inventory updates” process and share it with the ops team.

That’s it. One area, three focused actions. No bloated project, no new tools required.

Inventory Is a Living Operational Product

When operators own the inventory, security improves without the constant pushing. The list stops being “security’s spreadsheet” and becomes the single source of truth everyone actually uses.

Trust beats completeness every time. Get the fundamentals right, keep it alive, and you’ll spend a lot less time chasing ghosts and a lot more time protecting the processes that matter.

Ready to build an inventory your operators will actually use? The team at Koniag Cyber works with OT leaders every day to turn this from theory into practice.

About the resource
What you'll learn
Who is this resource for?
Download Why Operators Don’t Trust Your OT Asset Inventory and How to Fix It in 30 Days
Download Resource
Thank you and enjoy the resource
View Resource
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.